Oct
2000
CALIBER SELECTION
FOR SNIPING
Part 1
by
Michael Haugen
copyright Precision Shooter Magazine, Inc 2000
Whenever tactical shooters gather
one of the most prominent discussions likely to occur is the one about
various sniper rifles. You will routinely hear statements why this rifle
is outstanding and that one not so outstanding. This discussion quickly
transitions into one of calibers and all the things associated with them.
The fact of the matter is that
in todays market the actual rifle is not as much the issue as the
caliber. This is reflected by the fact that in most "world class" rifles
and systems the consumer can obtain almost any caliber he wishes. So,
what is all of the "hub-bub " around calibers? Why is one better
than another? Which is the right one for you and your organization? Well
in this article I will address some of the current "popular" calibers
and why some are better than others in specific situations.
Sniper weapons are grouped by caliber
into Light, Medium and Heavy categories each intended to meet certain
needs. Before we actually get into the categories themselves we must go
over a few items of interest.
There isnt one "do-it-all" caliber.
There are some that come close but every one has its own drawbacks.
Each caliber can perform
drastically different given changes in bullet weights and shapes,
powder types and amounts, and even different casings. This
is the sole reason that this issue is so hotly debated. You
commonly hear things like "given
caliber such and such with this bullet and charge it will fly and react
just as well as bullet X". I am not going into this argument
rather I will talk more about factory ammunition in common offerings.
I will mention some exceptions but only briefly.
I am not trying to convince anyone
of anything here. I am merely trying to educate some and entertain others.
I firmly believe in your right as an American to believe what you wish
and exercise that right.
There are some calibers which although
technically belong in one category perform as if in another. There isnt
enough space here to discuss every caliber let alone all of the variations
of each. Therefore, I will stick to common calibers with common ammunition/loads.
As I briefly mentioned, the family of SWS is designed to allow procurement
guys and leaders to differentiate not only between the different weapons/calibers
but also mission profiles for each.
The Light Family
The light family is comprised of everything
below .30 caliber such as the .223 (5.56mm). Rifles commonly found here
are of course the M16A2 and the M4 carbine. This caliber is however currently
offered by virtually every manufacturer of quality sniper grade weapons
in both bolt and gas systems. The 5.56mm was until a few years ago considered
a 300-yard weapon at best, however with the advent of heavy competitor
interest and use, huge advancements have occurred with relation to this
caliber. It is very common today to see M16 variants being used in all
facets of competition to include 1000 yards matches. There are very few
shooters that I have met that would attempt to convince anyone that the
5.56mm is as capable a sniper round as 7.62mm, however the 5.56mm definitely
does have a place among tactical marksman. Currently this caliber is being
used predominately by Law Enforcement Agencies (LEA). However, the military
Special Operations community is beginning to recognize its capabilities
especially in environments where long-range shots (over 600 meters) are
not expected. The lower ammunition and weapon weight allows the team to
carry more and provide a quick reaction capability in high threat areas.
The down sides of the 5.56mm are reduced range capabilities (due mainly
to reduced terminal effects at the longer ranges), lowered barrier penetration
capabilities at the longer ranges, and a lowered tolerance to environmental
conditions such as wind. The overall potential of this caliber is outstanding
especially given the wide variety of ammunition currently available. I
personally own 3 rifles chambered in 5.56mm and truly enjoy them all.
The Medium Family
The medium family encompasses
all of the .30 caliber cartridges. Now I must note that there is
a lot of argument and discussion concerning the magnum calibers specifically
the .300 Winchester Magnum and the .338 - .416 or .338 Lapua Magnum.
Regardless, a .30 caliber cartridge of one denomination or the other
has been the predominate sniper choice since WWI. The .308 (7.62mm
x 51mm NATO) which for reasons I will not entertain now is the current
caliber of choice for both military and LEA sniping. Despite what many
of you may think this caliber has severed snipers well over the years
accounting for numerous engagements and astounding feats. Just as is
happening now with the 5.56mm the .308 underwent vast improvements
in the early years mainly due to competitors and a desire for better
ballistics. So much has been written concerning the .308 that I don't
really feel a need to pontificate at length about it suffice to say
that it is as capable today as it was 20 years ago. I am sure that
I do not have to mention to anyone reading this that the .308 is currently
offered in every form of weapons system offered. In fact I think I
can safety say that the .308 is probably the most chambered caliber
for sniping today. I would be highly remiss in my duties if I did not
mention the .30-06, which served with great distinction and for so
long before the .308. This caliber as with the .308 is still very capable
and in some circles considered the most versatile high-powered caliber
on the market. The "06" really bridges the gap between the
.308 and the .300 Winchester Magnum performing well out to 1000 yards.
As I mentioned the magnum calibers
has been the point of discussion at all levels for some times. It was
such a concern that the US Army M24 was developed using the Remington
long action to allow for possible rechambering in .300 Winchester Magnum
in the future. The ballistic advantage that the .300 has over the .308
doesnt even really occur until 600 meters and beyond. So, for this
reason we in the Army have relegated the .300 to specific mission profiles
and for the most part employ the .308 exclusively. With the rising
popularity of the .338 - .416 or .338 Lapua Magnum more and more snipers
are considering the procurement and use of this high-powered cartridge.
There are several companies offering the .338 Lapua Magnum as a sniper
caliber citing outstanding ballistic penetration and extreme long-range
capability. The last thing I would like to say about the magnum calibers
is that "more is not
necessarily better". With the heavier calibers come heavier weapons,
ammunition and accessories. Also in terms of LEA, liability issues become
more prevalent meaning that engaging a criminal with one of these calibers
could result in less than favorable experiences in court. Even with this
I would add that there is definitely a niche for the magnums in the tactical
environment.
The Heavy Family
Of course the first thing that
comes to mind when discussing the heavy sniper calibers is the awesome
.50 caliber Special Application Sniper Rifle (SASR). This round has
received probably the lions share of press recently and is even currently
under consideration by the U.S. Congress for inclusion as a "Destructive Device".
Well first of all there is a lot of misconceptions concerning this caliber
especially revolving around its effective range. Some people will state
with a straight face that the .50 caliber when fired from a sniper rifle
is capable of consistent hits on man-sized targets out to and including
2500 meters. Now before I get loads of hate mail let me say that "yes
the .50 has obtained hits at extreme ranges" and "yes the round
itself will fly in excess of 2500 meters", however there are so
many factors that come into play when shooting at that distance that
routine hits are at best infrequent. Another aspect of the .50 that is
not widely known is the lack of accurate ammunition. The shooters of
the .50 caliber Shooters Association handload and work very hard to obtain
the accuracy they desire. Issue and factory ammunition is not by definition
made for accuracy. Keep in mind that military .50 caliber ammunition
is designed to be fired through machineguns, not sniper rifles. Either
way, the big .50 has excellent barrier penetration capabilities and is
very efficient when used against lightly armored vehicles and positions
(the actual intent of the weapon) at medium and long ranges (400 800
meters). Even more so than with the .30 caliber magnum weapons the .50
caliber SASR presents several extremely negative aspects. Some that leap
to mind is the vastly increased weight of both the weapon and ammunition.
Additionally, upon firing, the .50 caliber provides a shockwave (when
using weapons with muzzle brakes that direct the blast rearward) that
if experienced repeatedly will result in physical illness in the form
of dizziness and nausea. As with the all of the other sniper calibers,
the .50 definitely has a place in the tactical sniper environment however,
not where most would think.
CALIBER SELECTION
FOR SNIPING Part 2
by
Michael Haugen
Caliber selection is one of those
things about long-range shooting that is always in contention. I think
that it is safe to say that every caliber has its own champion who
has a litany of reasons to support his/her opinions. Hopefully this
article will help out someone who can not quite seem to get past all
of the hype and confusing information relating to ballistics (interior,
exterior and terminal).
What is the best choice
for me?
This seems to be the question of the
day. Arriving at an answer can be quite a challenge given the vast number
of calibers, weapons and endless advice from writers (yours truly included),
friends, and other shooters. So, lets try and give some guidance or
at least some guidelines that may help you make a choice.
RANGE
You must determine the maximum range
you expect to employ the weapon system Keep in mind that the .30 calibers
are virtually the same out to about 600 meters. At the closer ranges,
it makes sense to use a lower recoiling weapon that can be trained with.
What I am referring to is that the heavier calibers result in more recoil
(harder to train with), reduced barrel life (more expensive) and heavier
weapon weight (harder to employ). If you are a LEA officer working primarily
in an urban area where shots are usually less than 100 meters, than something
from the light family may fit the bill. However, if you are military sniper
working in a desert area where ranges can easily exceed 900 meters, than
the .300 WM or .338 Lapua Magnum may be a better choice. If your max range
is somewhere in the middle than the .30 calibers may be the best choice.
Keep in mind that ammunition choice plays a huge role in how a caliber
performs. So, you could employ a light caliber with several types (weights)
of ammunition to meet several mission profiles.
BALLISTIC
PENETRATION
You must look at what you are most
likely to have to penetrate during your duties. Again if you are a LEA
officer who works a rough part of town that sees barricaded suspects
routinely and your department has a history of allowing shots through
windows or doors you may wish to choose a .30 caliber. Now before the
.223 aficionados scream, I must add that certain .223 projectiles
have very good penetration qualities. Of course on the other side of
the coin, if you are expected to interdict lightly armored targets
than a heavy .30 or even something from the heavy family may be in
order. A point I must make here is that the .30 calibers will penetrate
much more than most people think, and the .50 caliber will penetrate
much less than most believe. What you have to do is conduct your own
tests on items that are common in your area or that you think you may
have to penetrate. A note on glass here; there is a lot of misinformation
out there concerning glass penetration. I can tell you from experience
that you MUST conduct tests on the type
of glass you expect to encounter with the glass framed in order to get
true results. Do not rely on commercially available printed glass shooting
results.
ENVIRONMENTALS
This relates to the physical environment
that you will have to employ in. Any experienced shooter knows that most
environmentals can be overcome with proper ammunition selection and training.
However, some calibers are affected less than others are. Generally the
heavier the caliber the less it is affected by wind, altitude and humidity
(to a degree). This subject is of course highly affected and interlaced
with numerous other factors such as training, ammunition, etc. However,
I think that it is safe to say that if you are limited to one type of
ammunition, cannot train extensively and live and work in an area where
the environmental conditions are volatile (large changes) you may be wise
to adopt a caliber from the medium family.
TRAINING
This is the most important of
all considerations. You need a caliber (and weapon) that you can
train with extensively. This is where the light family really excels
due to decreased ammunition costs, comfort of shooting, increased
barrel life and excellent accuracy potential. The heavier calibers
especially the magnums can be very costly to train with on a routine
basis not to mention the physical abuse you will receive during the
training. Trained professional shooters should fire at least two
days every month at a minimum. Ideally the shooters should fire one
week a month to remain current and to progress their skills. Training
must be realistic and "push the envelope" to
allow shooters to enhance their skills and understand the limitations
of themselves and their equipment.
A Note
on Ammunition and Accuracy
As you all know, for every caliber
there are numerous choices of ammunition. For precision work you will
of course need accurate ammunition. The key here is to do your research
and choose a brand, load, etc. of ammunition that has a history of accuracy
with your type of weapon. It is very easy to chase accuracy through different
brands and types of ammunition. Pick one, test it completely and then
make a decision.
Accuracy can be an elusive animal.
It can and will be the subject of frustrating (bordering on maddening)
and elated moments during your shooting sessions. What you have to do
is determine your accuracy needs that correspond to your perceived mission
profile/s. It is extremely easy to chase better accuracy far beyond your
needs. Military snipers for instance, need to be able to hold approximately
2-MOA with his given weapon and ammunition. This insures that he can engage
targets out to and including 600 meters with a high hit probability. This
is not to say that the shooter should not strive for better accuracy (within
his limits), more to say that at any given moment he must be able to hold
the 2-MOA standard in any environment.
I am sure that more than one reader
of this article is thinking about why I havent addressed specific weapons
systems. Well as I stated in the beginning, you can virtually purchase
any system in any caliber you desire, so the weapons system itself becomes
almost irrelevant. The problem lies in the fact that the type of weapon
you choose is affected by mainly operational concerns such as threat,
operational area (urban or rural) and anticipated mission profiles. I
would offer that you should choose the caliber first, then choose a weapons
system that has a history of shooting that caliber well and meets your
operational needs. For the hobbyist, it all comes down to your personal
preference and financial capability.
At a minimum I hope that this article
has been the cause for some thought. At a maximum I hope that out there
somewhere this article has caused someone to make an educated analysis
on the weapon system that they are going to procure rather than purchasing
one based on mere opinion and media hype.
|